Profitable the Brisbane 2032 narrative: A media evaluation

object(WP_Post)#8599 (24) {
[“ID”]=>
int(41918)
[“post_author”]=>
string(2) “36”
[“post_date”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-29 03:18:49”
[“post_date_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-29 03:18:49”
[“post_content”]=>
string(7746) “

What’s the Albanese authorities’s actual recreation plan for its second time period, and the way will it play out within the media? Isentia lately introduced collectively three of Australia’s prime political journalists to tug again the curtain: Peter Gearin, Editor in Chief atThe Mandarin, Jason Koutsoukis from The Saturday Paper, and acclaimed broadcaster Virginia Haussegger AM, for a panel with our companions CPRA on the Authorities Communications Discussion board, held on the Nationwide Press Membership

For communications execs, the dialog was filled with clues about what to anticipate subsequent from Canberra.

A wise technique or a wasted alternative?

The panel honed in on the federal government’s positioning since its “monumental election victory” an “oddly quiet return to political normality.” It’s a query each political operator is asking: is that this a calculated, good and secure strategy, or is the federal government squandering an opportunity to be “daring and progressive”?

Peter Gearin urged the warning is deliberate and right here to remain. His take? The federal government realized an enormous lesson from the Voice referendum, when Labor bit off an excessive amount of, which means the Authorities now desires to occupy the political centre and received’t threat getting caught out like that once more. Count on the cautious strategy and the first-term playbook to proceed.

What sits behind this posture is a need to maneuver past being a celebration in energy to being seen because the get together of presidency. Whereas critics argue this appears like stagnation, supporters see a measured model that prioritises belief over spectacle.

What’s on the agenda? Coverage and Parliament

So, what are the important thing points the federal government must nail this time period? The panel highlighted a number of areas to look at carefully:

• Financial messaging: The current Financial Roundtable was seen as the federal government’s try to fastidiously make the case or check the waters for change. How this interprets into precise coverage can be a significant check.

• The general public sector: The Mandarin’s editor pointed to the continued agenda for Australia’s public servants and the federal government’s plans for enhancing the sector. Katy Gallagher is driving a imaginative and prescient of “evolution, not revolution” with a deal with strengthening in-house functionality and decreasing reliance on consultants.

• Parliamentary chess: With the brand new make-up of parliament, will the federal government preserve looking for consensus with the opposition, or will it work with the Greens to drive a extra progressive agenda? This strategic selection will outline the time period. The Greens are repositioning to be extra pragmatic on the federal degree, whereas the Coalition stays fragmented. A weak opposition might make the federal government’s path smoother, however it additionally dangers decreasing contestability and scrutiny within the system.

Management and cupboard confidence

A lot of the federal government’s steadiness comes from its inside group. Albanese is seen as a strategic operator with deep Labor roots, and his confidence is backed by a cohesive cupboard. Ministers like Jim Chalmers and Katy Gallagher have emerged as key gamers, bolstering the sense of stability. This team-based energy underpins the federal government’s cautious however deliberate model.

Balancing international coverage and nationwide curiosity

Whereas home coverage dominates headlines, the federal government can be asserting nationwide curiosity overseas. Stability in international coverage has been a part of its technique to mission maturity and keep away from overreach. This layer of pragmatism provides to the notion of a authorities intent on consolidating itself as a long-term, regular hand.

From broadcasting to narrowcasting

For communicators, the true gold was the dialogue on methods to get a message throughout in immediately’s advanced and huge media panorama.

The panel explored the federal government’s newer ways, just like the PM’s appearances on common podcasts with influencers comparable to Abby Chatfield and Hannah Ferguson. This displays a broader shift from broadcasting to narrowcasting, with messages tailor-made to segmented audiences relatively than a one-size-fits-all strategy. Success now is dependent upon understanding fragmented channels and feeding high-quality, various content material into the ecosystem.

However even because the playbook evolves, there’s an argument for getting the fundamentals proper. Gearin believes the media’s core job is to speak fact to energy and clarify how authorities selections truly have an effect on residents, relatively than simply specializing in the politics or the optics. As information consumption habits change, particularly amongst youthful Australians, this steadiness between accountability and relevance is extra essential than ever.

We’re watching a authorities taking part in a cautious lengthy recreation, intent on cementing itself because the get together of presidency whereas avoiding the dangers of overreach. On the identical time, the opposition’s weak point and media’s evolution increase questions on accountability and contestability. For communicators, understanding each the federal government’s measured technique and the fast-changing media playbook is important to navigating the time period forward.

”
[“post_title”]=>
string(81) “Cautious, thought-about, or coasting? Decoding the Albanese authorities’s second time period”
[“post_excerpt”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_status”]=>
string(7) “publish”
[“comment_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“ping_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“post_password”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_name”]=>
string(46) “albanese-government-second-term-media-strategy”
[“to_ping”]=>
string(0) “”
[“pinged”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_modified”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-29 03:18:52”
[“post_modified_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-29 03:18:52”
[“post_content_filtered”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_parent”]=>
int(0)
[“guid”]=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=41918”
[“menu_order”]=>
int(0)
[“post_type”]=>
string(4) “put up”
[“post_mime_type”]=>
string(0) “”
[“comment_count”]=>
string(1) “0”
[“filter”]=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}

object(WP_Post)#8692 (24) {
[“ID”]=>
int(41445)
[“post_author”]=>
string(2) “36”
[“post_date”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-18 00:58:56”
[“post_date_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-18 00:58:56”
[“post_content”]=>
string(7682) “

At Isentia’s Past the Barossa panel, business leaders from tourism, larger schooling, authorities, defence, and media got here collectively to debate how South Australia is being positioned, each to its personal individuals and to the world. The dialogue highlighted shared challenges, alternatives, and the important function of communications in shaping South Australia’s id.

South Australia’s model: confidence and complexity

Chris Burford (South Australian Tourism Fee) outlined the twin problem of constructing nationwide and worldwide consciousness whereas fostering native satisfaction. Whereas South Australia at the moment ranks sixth of eight states on “attraction and consideration” as a vacationer vacation spot, it leads the nation in state satisfaction. Occasions like Liv Golf and Collect Spherical have helped South Australians really feel extra assured about their state, and post-COVID reflections have pushed a higher appreciation for the standard of life.

The SATC’s Have a good time the Easy Pleasures marketing campaign displays a transfer towards “place branding,” focusing much less on iconic landmarks and extra on the lived expertise of being in South Australia. The analysis underpinning the marketing campaign revealed a constant theme: South Australians need the state to “develop however not change” embracing progress whereas retaining its distinct character.

Schooling and international perceptions

Djurdjica Arslanagic  (Adelaide College) famous that Adelaide’s notion internationally has shifted from being seen as a regional metropolis to a globally engaging vacation spot for college kids. South Australia’s popularity as welcoming, secure, and supportive resonates strongly with worldwide households making schooling decisions. With the upcoming merger of Adelaide’s universities, communication is targeted on tailoring messages to diversified stakeholders, from college students to alumni to authorities, guaranteeing consistency whereas assembly completely different wants.

Defence, business and the workforce problem

Sasha Meldrum (Nova Techniques) mentioned the big communications problem posed by AUKUS and the dimensions of defence business development. With tens of 1000’s of employees required, from shipbuilders to nuclear scientists, attracting expertise domestically and globally will demand new coverage approaches and contemporary messaging. Meldrum emphasised that communicators should additionally assist shift perceptions of defence, reframing it as not solely about warfare but in addition about peacekeeping, safety, and technological development.

Media fragmentation and focused storytelling

Verity Edwards (Hughes PR) mirrored on the contraction of South Australian newsrooms and the rise of other platforms. Conventional status shops like The Advertiser nonetheless maintain affect, however methods now require concentrating on the best viewers with the best medium. For some purchasers, business publications or regional media can have far higher impression than mainstream shops. Edwards highlighted the necessity for nuanced communication methods that prioritise outcomes over publicity, and lateral considering to match tales with audiences.

The local weather story

A key problem raised in the course of the Q&A was South Australia’s ongoing algal bloom disaster. Burford famous its extreme impression on coastal communities and tourism, with uncertainty round long-term restoration. He confused the significance of communication grounded in science and transparency to take care of public belief, evaluating the problem to COVID in its unpredictability. The dialogue highlighted how essential clear, proactive communication is, each in explaining what’s taking place and in shaping the narrative round subsequent steps.

Key Takeaways:

• Confidence in id – South Australians are extra assured of their story, however lifting nationwide and worldwide visibility stays a precedence.
• Nuanced storytelling – Completely different audiences, from universities to defence to tourism, require tailor-made approaches that steadiness authenticity with technique.
• Collaboration – Trade, authorities, and academia should align communications to sort out workforce, financial, and reputational challenges.
• Suppose laterally – Success isn’t at all times about “large hits”; smaller, focused placements typically ship essentially the most impression.

Contact us to find how communicators are navigating advanced industries, participating various audiences, and shaping tales that resonate. You can too watch the complete panel dialogue right here.

”
[“post_title”]=>
string(68) “Past the Barossa: Speaking South Australia’s evolving story”
[“post_excerpt”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_status”]=>
string(7) “publish”
[“comment_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“ping_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“post_password”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_name”]=>
string(31) “strategic-storytelling-pr-comms”
[“to_ping”]=>
string(0) “”
[“pinged”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_modified”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-21 04:00:33”
[“post_modified_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-21 04:00:33”
[“post_content_filtered”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_parent”]=>
int(0)
[“guid”]=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=41445”
[“menu_order”]=>
int(0)
[“post_type”]=>
string(4) “put up”
[“post_mime_type”]=>
string(0) “”
[“comment_count”]=>
string(1) “0”
[“filter”]=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}

object(WP_Post)#8374 (24) {
[“ID”]=>
int(41107)
[“post_author”]=>
string(2) “36”
[“post_date”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-07 00:11:43”
[“post_date_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-07 00:11:43”
[“post_content”]=>
string(6626) “

A important blind spot has emerged in Australia’s housing debate. An evaluation of stories protection in comparison with social dialogue reveals that the dialog taking place within the information media, a peaceful, ‘top-down’ dialogue of economic technique for present householders, is dangerously disconnected from the uncooked, emotional actuality unfolding on social media. 

Whereas information shops deal with rates of interest and mortgage recommendation, the general public dialog is a unstable, ‘bottom-up’ outcry over the lived expertise of unaffordability and political frustration. This hole between the monetary narrative and the general public’s emotional actuality represents a big strategic threat for any organisation speaking on this area.

 In stark distinction, social media is having a “bottom-up” dialog, specializing in the private ache factors of value, blame, and political frustration. It speaks from throughout the economic system. At its coronary heart, this dialog is pushed by the uncooked, private impression of an unaffordable market; customers aren’t debating summary forecasts, they’re lamenting the “exorbitant” value of “multimillion greenback postage stamp sized tenancies.” This private frustration then rapidly seeks a goal, splintering into direct political blame over particular tax insurance policies and a deep-seated criticism of the planning paperwork, which is seen as a elementary roadblock.

The core theme is the lived expertise of exorbitant actual property costs, with customers immediately linking excessive property values to the unaffordability of on a regular basis life and enterprise. There’s a robust undercurrent of blame directed at planners, councils, and perceived bureaucratic inefficiency as a main driver of the housing scarcity. The housing dialogue is ceaselessly and explicitly politicised, with customers tying the disaster to taxation or financial insurance policies.

Evaluation exhibits a public perception that the federal government is prioritising personal builders over weak residents. The revelation of stakeholder conferences behind closed doorways to debate ‘funding fashions’ for public housing towers for instance has solidified a story of privatisation by stealth. The decision for public housing is a direct demand for the federal government to re-assert its function as a protector of residents, not a facilitator for personal revenue. Underpinning all of those options is a palpable sense of ethical urgency, pushed by the seen ‘human value’ of the disaster. However this frustration just isn’t passive. With requires road resistance and building unions to refuse demolition work, the message is evident: if these concrete actions should not taken, the dialog will transfer from on-line boards to the streets and worksites.

Monitoring and figuring out these distinct ideological fault strains is essential. It permits a communications group to know the precise arguments and set off phrases of every camp. Any authorities announcement is not going to be obtained by a single public, however will land on this fractured neighborhood and be interpreted by means of these pre-existing lenses.

”
[“post_title”]=>
string(32) “Contained in the disconnect on housing”
[“post_excerpt”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_status”]=>
string(7) “publish”
[“comment_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“ping_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“post_password”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_name”]=>
string(32) “inside-the-disconnect-on-housing”
[“to_ping”]=>
string(0) “”
[“pinged”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_modified”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-07 00:11:48”
[“post_modified_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-07 00:11:48”
[“post_content_filtered”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_parent”]=>
int(0)
[“guid”]=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=41107”
[“menu_order”]=>
int(0)
[“post_type”]=>
string(4) “put up”
[“post_mime_type”]=>
string(0) “”
[“comment_count”]=>
string(1) “0”
[“filter”]=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}

object(WP_Post)#10960 (24) {
[“ID”]=>
int(40160)
[“post_author”]=>
string(2) “36”
[“post_date”]=>
string(19) “2025-05-26 02:54:37”
[“post_date_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-05-26 02:54:37”
[“post_content”]=>
string(3706) “

Throughout the communications panorama, groups are being requested to do extra with much less, whereas staying aligned, responsive and compliant within the face of advanced and infrequently shifting stakeholder calls for. In that atmosphere, how we observe, report and handle {our relationships} actually issues.

In too many organisations, relationship administration remains to be constructed round instruments designed for buyer gross sales. CRM programs, constructed for structured pipelines and linear consumer journeys, have lengthy been the default for managing contact databases. They work properly for gross sales and customer support capabilities. However for communications professionals managing journalists, political places of work, inside leaders and exterior advocates, these instruments typically fall brief.

Stakeholder relationships don’t observe a straight line. They modify relying on context, formed by coverage shifts, public sentiment, media narratives or disaster response. A stakeholder could also be supportive one week and demanding the following. They typically maintain a couple of function, and their affect doesn’t match neatly right into a funnel or metric.

Managing these relationships requires greater than contact administration. It requires context. The power to see not simply who you spoke to, however why, and what occurred subsequent. Communications groups want shared visibility throughout points and departments. As reporting expectations develop, that info have to be searchable, safe and aligned with wider organisational targets.

What’s typically lacking is infrastructure. With out the best programs, strategic relationship administration turns into fragmented or reactive. Generally it turns into invisible altogether.

That is the place Stakeholder Relationship Administration (SRM) enters the dialog. Not as a brand new acronym, however as a special mind-set about affect.

At Isentia, we’ve seen how a purpose-built SRM platform will help communications groups navigate complexity extra confidently. Ours affords a safe, centralised area to log and observe each interplay, whether or not it’s a media enquiry, a ministerial assembly, or a neighborhood replace, and hyperlink it to your group’s broader communications exercise.

The intention isn’t to automate relationships. It’s to make them simpler to handle, measure and preserve. It’s about creating inside coordination earlier than the exterior message goes out.

As a result of in immediately’s communications atmosphere, stakeholder engagement isn’t just a assist operate. It’s a strategic functionality.

Thinking about how different groups are managing their stakeholder relationships? Get in contact at nbt@isentia.com or submit an enquiry.

”
[“post_title”]=>
string(52) “SRM vs CRM: which is correct for PR & Comms groups?”
[“post_excerpt”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_status”]=>
string(7) “publish”
[“comment_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“ping_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“post_password”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_name”]=>
string(44) “srm-vs-crm-which-is-right-for-pr-comms-teams”
[“to_ping”]=>
string(0) “”
[“pinged”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_modified”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-11 04:09:29”
[“post_modified_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-08-11 04:09:29”
[“post_content_filtered”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_parent”]=>
int(0)
[“guid”]=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=40160”
[“menu_order”]=>
int(0)
[“post_type”]=>
string(4) “put up”
[“post_mime_type”]=>
string(0) “”
[“comment_count”]=>
string(1) “0”
[“filter”]=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}