Do you need to sponsor this article with over 370,000 subscribers, my podcast, or different content material? Attain out to me straight and we are able to discover some choices Jacob[at]thefutureorganization[dot]com.
Be part of over 45,000 different subscribers who get Nice Management delivered on to their inbox every week. You’ll get entry to my finest considering and newest content material. Enroll at this time.
For those who’re a Chief Human Assets or Chief Individuals Officer, then you possibly can request to affix a model new neighborhood I put collectively referred to as Future Of Work Leaders which focuses on the way forward for work and worker expertise. Be part of leaders from Tractor Provide, Johnson & Johnson, Lego, Dow, Northrop Grumman and lots of others. We come collectively nearly every month and every year in-person to sort out huge themes that transcend conventional HR.
One of many quickest methods to lose your staff’s belief is avoiding the conversations that matter most. And who’s in charge when these robust talks require leaders to do a tough balancing act? On one hand, there’s rising strain to foster psychological security, prioritize well-being, and create a supportive work surroundings.
However, leaders nonetheless have to drive accountability, handle efficiency, and handle tough behaviors. Generally it’s simpler to keep away from these conversations than face them. Some leaders are hesitant to provide suggestions out of concern of being labeled as “too harsh,” misunderstood, and even going through backlash from staff.
This management problem is on the heart of our newest episode of the Future Prepared Management podcast with Paul Falcone, bestselling writer and former CHRO of Nickelodeon Animation. Paul breaks down why robust conversations will not be the issue, however avoiding them is. He shares how leaders can strategy these moments with readability, confidence, and compassion, with out alienating their groups.
Hearken to the episode right here on Apple Podcast & depart a assessment!
What Leaders Get Fallacious About Robust Conversations
Most leaders’ default response to battle is usually avoidance. It’s a common fact, and it’s not as a result of they’re careless, it’s the opposite. They don’t need to demotivate their groups, harm relationships, or create battle.
However that avoidance is precisely the problem. When managers wait too lengthy to say one thing, they might let points fester, and ultimately, they find yourself exploding in frustration, usually with no documentation or context to help their case.
Paul argues that true management means leaning into discomfort with readability, consistency, and compassion. That begins with understanding what a troublesome dialog actually is: it’s not about confrontation, it’s about serving to somebody see a blind spot that would maintain them again.
The Shift from Judgment to Teaching
We’ve been conditioned to imagine that coping with robust conversations all the time means it’s about punishment. However Paul Falcone challenges us to a mindset shift by reframing suggestions as a present as a substitute. “For those who really care about somebody’s progress,” he says, “you owe it to them to be trustworthy in a manner that helps, not humiliates.”
Robust conversations, when executed proper, are career-development conversations. As an alternative of criticizing conduct or questioning intent, Paul encourages leaders to attach suggestions to teaching. This fashion, you possibly can course appropriate and help your folks’s long-term success by constructing their confidence, sharpen their abilities, and unlock alternatives.
He additionally introduces a robust framework for navigating suggestions conversations: the “Efficiency vs. Conduct” mannequin. For example it, think about a circle break up in two.
On one aspect is efficiency—what somebody achieves.
On the opposite is conduct—how they present up.
Most managers focus too closely on efficiency and ignore conduct, however as Paul explains, each are important for constructing future leaders. If somebody excels on metrics however undermines tradition, you’ve obtained an issue.
Hearken to the episode right here on Apple Podcast & depart a assessment!
Constructing Accountability With out Worry
So how do you ship this sort of suggestions with out triggering defensiveness or disengagement? As an alternative of overwhelming your staff with inflexible guidelines or fixed confrontation, Paul recommends approaches that open dialogue, cut back defensiveness, and foster progress.
One of the vital efficient methods is what Paul calls the “iron hand with a velvet glove” strategy. Leaders ought to keep clear requirements and excessive expectations (the iron hand), however talk these expectations with respect, encouragement, and care (the velvet glove).
Meaning creating protected communication techniques (like utilizing a “protected phrase” reminiscent of permission to open trustworthy dialogue), internet hosting common growth check-ins, and welcoming team-led reflections on efficiency and tradition.
In reality, Paul recommends quarterly, employee-led check-ins the place the worker, not the supervisor, units the agenda. This strategy not solely reinforces autonomy and accountability but in addition makes suggestions a two-way road. Leaders who mannequin openness and vulnerability are way more prone to obtain constructive suggestions in return.
Rethinking Psychological Security
A serious mistake leaders make to keep away from robust conversations at work is decreasing requirements to maintain the peace. Paul cautions in opposition to over-indexing on consolation and sensitivity on the expense of excessive requirements.
An excessive amount of sensitivity can truly weaken efficiency cultures. When leaders really feel like they’ll’t communicate up with out being labeled harsh or discriminatory, they pull again. In the meantime, expectations blur, and requirements drop.
True psychological security isn’t about shielding folks from suggestions. It’s about creating an area the place honesty and progress are potential. The answer isn’t to swing again towards authoritarianism. It’s to be intentional and trustworthy concerning the sort of tradition you’re making an attempt to create.
As Paul places it, “Be clear about who you might be as a pacesetter. If this isn’t the fitting place for somebody, that’s okay—however don’t attempt to be all issues to all folks.”
The Actual Work of Management: Introspection and Alignment
On the coronary heart of the whole lot Paul shares is a problem to rethink how we outline management itself. It’s not nearly KPIs or managing deliverables—it’s about constructing belief, creating folks, and having the braveness to talk fact when it issues most.
He poses a robust query each chief ought to ask: “Would you need to give you the results you want?” If the reply is something however a assured sure, then it’s time to pause and mirror. Suggestions conversations aren’t nearly others, they reveal who we’re as leaders.
Robust conversations don’t must be feared. In reality, when dealt with with care and readability, they’ll grow to be the inspiration for a stronger, extra resilient staff. If you wish to discover ways to give suggestions that builds belief, leads with empathy, and reinforces accountability, don’t miss this dialog with Paul Falcone. His frameworks and tales will depart you considering in another way about what it really means to guide.
Hearken to the episode right here on Apple Podcast & depart a assessment!
