Google triggered controversy amongst some builders this weekend and at present, Monday, February twenty third, after limiting their utilization of its new Antigravity "vibe coding" platform, alleging "maliciously utilization."
Some customers who had been utilizing the open supply autonomous AI agent OpenClaw along side brokers constructed on Antigravity, in addition to those that had linked OpenClaw brokers to their Gmails, claimed on social media that they misplaced entry to their Google accounts.
Based on Google, stated customers had been utilizing Antigravity to entry a bigger variety of Gemini tokens by way of third-party platforms like OpenClaw, which overwhelmed the system for different Antigravity prospects.
This transfer has minimize off a number of customers, underscoring the architectural and belief points that may come up with OpenClaw. The timing of Google’s crackdown is especially pointed. Only one week in the past, on February 15, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman introduced that OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger had joined OpenAI to steer its “subsequent technology of private brokers.” Whereas OpenClaw stays an open-source venture below an unbiased basis, it’s now financially backed and strategically guided by Google’s main rival.
By slicing off OpenClaw’s entry to Antigravity, Google isn’t simply defending its server load; it’s successfully severing a pipeline that permits an OpenAI-adjacent software to leverage Google’s most superior Gemini fashions.
Google DeepMind engineer and former CEO and founding father of Windsurf, Varun Mohan, stated in an X submit that the corporate seen “malicious utilization” that led to service degradation.
“We’ve been seeing an enormous enhance in malicious utilization of the Antigravity backend that has tremendously degraded the standard of service for our customers. We wanted to discover a path to shortly shut off entry to those customers that aren’t utilizing the product as supposed. We perceive {that a} subset of those customers weren’t conscious that this was in opposition to our ToS [Terms of Service] and can get a path for them to return again on however now we have restricted capability and wish to be truthful to our precise customers,” the submit stated.
A Google DeepMind spokesperson informed VentureBeat that the transfer is to not completely ban using Antigravity to entry third-party platforms, however to align its use with the platform’s phrases of service.
Unsurprisingly, Google’s transfer has triggered a furor amongst OpenClaw customers, together with from OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger, who introduced that OpenClaw will take away Google assist consequently.
Infrastructure and connection uncertainty
OpenClaw emerged as a means for particular person customers to run shell instructions and entry native recordsdata, fulfilling a serious promise of AI brokers: effectively operating workflows for customers.
However, as VentureBeat has regularly identified, it could possibly typically run into safety and guardrail points. There are corporations constructing methods for enterprise prospects to entry OpenClaw securely and with a governance layer, although OpenClaw is so new that we must always count on extra bulletins quickly.
Nevertheless, Google’s transfer was not framed as a safety problem however reasonably as one in every of entry and runtime, additional exhibiting that there’s nonetheless important uncertainty when customers wish to usher in one thing like OpenClaw into their workflow.
This isn’t the primary time builders and energy customers of agentic AI discovered their entry curtailed. Final yr, Anthropic throttled entry to Claude Code after the corporate claimed some customers had been abusing the system by operating it 24/7.
What this does spotlight is the disconnect between corporations like Google and OpenClaw customers. OpenClaw supplied many attention-grabbing potentialities for creating workflows with brokers. Nevertheless, as a result of it’s frequently evolving, customers might inadvertently run afoul of ToS or price limits.
Mohan stated Google is working to deliver the banned customers again, however whether or not this implies the corporate will amend its ToS or work out a safe connection between OpenClaw brokers and Antigravity fashions stays to be seen.
For builders, the message is obvious: the period of "deliver your individual agent" to a frontier mannequin is ending. Suppliers are actually prioritizing vertically built-in experiences the place they will seize 100% of the telemetry and subscription income, typically on the expense of the open-source interoperability that outlined the early days of the LLM increase.
Affected customers
A number of customers stated on each the Y Combinator chat boards and X that they now not had entry to their Google accounts after operating OpenClaw situations for sure Google merchandise.
Google’s transfer mirrors a broader trade shift towards "walled backyard" agent ecosystems. Earlier this yr, Anthropic launched "consumer fingerprinting" to make sure that its Claude Code atmosphere stays the unique interface for its fashions, successfully locking out third-party wrappers like OpenClaw. For builders, the message is obvious: the period of "deliver your individual agent" to a frontier mannequin is ending. Suppliers are actually prioritizing vertically built-in experiences the place they will seize 100% of the telemetry and subscription income, typically on the expense of the open-source interoperability that outlined the early days of the LLM increase.
Some have stated they are going to now not use Google or Gemini for his or her tasks. Proper now, individuals who nonetheless wish to hold utilizing Antigravity might want to wait till Google figures out a means for them to make use of OpenClaw and entry Gemini tokens in a way Google deems “truthful.”
Google DeepMind reiterated that it had solely minimize entry to Antigravity, to not different Google purposes.
Conclusion: the enterprise takeaway
For enterprise technical decision-makers, the "Antigravity Ban" serves as a definitive case research within the dangers of agentic dependency. Because the trade strikes from chatbots to autonomous brokers, the next realities should now dictate technique:
-
Platform fragility is the brand new regular: The sudden lockout of $250/month "Extremely" customers proves that even high-paying enterprise prospects have little leverage when a supplier decides to alter its "truthful use" definitions. Counting on OAuth-based third-party wrappers for core enterprise logic is now a high-risk gamble.
-
The rise of local-first governance: With OpenClaw transferring towards an OpenAI-backed basis and Google/Anthropic tightening their clouds, enterprises ought to prioritize agent frameworks that may run "local-first" or inside VPCs. The "token loophole" that OpenClaw exploited is being closed; future agentic scale would require direct, high-cost API contracts reasonably than backed shopper seats.
-
Account portability as a requirement: The truth that customers "misplaced entry to their Google accounts" underscores the hazard of bundling improvement environments with main identification suppliers. Determination-makers ought to decouple AI improvement from core company identification (SSO) the place doable to keep away from a single ToS violation paralyzing a whole crew's communications.
In the end, the Antigravity incident marks the tip of the "Wild West" for AI brokers. As Google and OpenAI stake their claims, the enterprise should select between the steadiness of the walled backyard or the complexity (and value) of actually unbiased, self-hosted infrastructure.
