Metropolis of Burnside Case Research – Media Monitoring with Isentia

object(WP_Post)#8615 (24) {
[“ID”]=>
int(42392)
[“post_author”]=>
string(2) “75”
[“post_date”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-30 02:09:06”
[“post_date_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-30 02:09:06”
[“post_content”]=>
string(11789) “

Mass AI-generated content material has overwhelmed our social feeds, and that has set a way of panic amongst PR leaders. Model communications have been tough earlier, however this has been exasperated even additional by AI content material. Audiences have been left confused, whether or not or not it’s not having the ability to differentiate between actual and faux personalities on-line or faux statements being circulated to mislead audiences. This has stored management questioning how they will lower via and influence their goal audiences who’re, in the mean time, overstimulated with AI-driven content material.

We analysed 30M information factors between 1st January 2025 – twelfth August 2025 globally on social and mainstream media like X, Boards, On-line information, LinkedIn, TikTok, Instagram and Fb. We checked out actual world circumstances of how audiences have been misled to consider one thing is actual, and the way this began a domino impact on the content material being consumed by the world in the present day.

The rise of artificial content material outranks fact-checkers by a mile

Artificial media has taken over the web and viewers feeds have been flooded with unrelated and unreliable AI content material. What’s essential to notice is that, with mass AI content material, unreliability can result in getting right into a harmful spiral of consuming nonsensical content material that doesn’t profit anyone. Consequently, audiences have began to defend the content material they see by desirous to solely subscribe to what conforms with their expectations. With a decline within the variety of fact-checkers, misinformation and disinformation have change into rampant.

Digital influencers are creeping in on social media feeds

Mia Zelu, a digital influencer, grew common throughout this 12 months’s Wimbledon. On her Instagram, she had uploaded a photograph carousel that appeared like she was bodily there on the All England Membership having fun with a drink. At first, she appeared actual, however the media and audiences shortly questioned it. She posted the photographs in July of this 12 months throughout the match with a caption, however was fast to disable her remark part including to the thriller and debate. There was quite a lot of on-line backlash with audiences clearly annoyed with how simply deceiving this might be. Regardless of the backlash, her follower rely grew and her account now has about 168k followers.

The conversations round AI influencers is simply simply starting and raises severe questions on authenticity, digital consumption and the way AI personas can really have an effect on viewers perceptions – with out really current.

AI means manufacturers are working in an area of diminished belief

In accordance with the AI Advertising Benchmark Report 2024, the belief deficit instantly impacts model communications methods, as 36.7% of entrepreneurs fear in regards to the authenticity of AI-driven content material, whereas 71% of shoppers admit they wrestle to belief what they see or hear due to AI.

Audiences will not be rejecting AI outright, however the opacity round it might be harmful, making their confidence in AI as a instrument shaky. That is the place PR leaders must make genuine communication a necessity and never only a “nice-to-have”. In instances the place audiences are doubting whether or not a message was written by a human or a machine, the worth of real and honest human-driven storytelling rises.

Actual-world situations the place AI as a instrument misses

Scepticism in direction of AI doesn’t simply come from high-profile controversies. It reveals up in small, on a regular basis moments that frustrate audiences and remind them how fragile belief might be.

• Grok’s picture blunder: A extensively shared picture of a younger lady begging for meals in Gaza was wrongly tagged by Grok as being from Iraq in 2004. The error unfold shortly throughout platforms, fuelling anger about misinformation and elevating questions in regards to the reliability of AI instruments.
• McDonald’s drive-thru glitch: A buyer within the US posted a TikTok exhibiting how AI at a drive-thru added 9 additional candy teas to her order. The error attributable to crosstalk from one other lane, might sound trivial, however it highlights how automation can fail at easy duties and the way simply these failures go viral when shared on-line.
• Air Canada chatbot case: A buyer looking for details about bereavement fares was misled by the airline’s chatbot. When the corporate was requested to clarify this, they claimed the chatbot was “answerable for its personal actions.” A Canadian tribunal then, rejected this defence and ordered Air Canada to compensate the passenger. The incident drew widespread protection, reinforcing public considerations that companies are over-relying on AI with out accountability.

Audiences count on to eat “extra actual and fewer faux”

---

Concerned about studying how Isentia will help? Fill in your particulars beneath to entry the complete Authenticity Report 2025 that uncovers cues for measuring model and stakeholder authenticity.

”
[“post_title”]=>
string(47) “How AI saturated viewers information and social feeds”
[“post_excerpt”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_status”]=>
string(7) “publish”
[“comment_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“ping_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“post_password”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_name”]=>
string(47) “how-ai-saturated-audience-news-and-social-feeds”
[“to_ping”]=>
string(0) “”
[“pinged”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_modified”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-30 03:03:42”
[“post_modified_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-30 03:03:42”
[“post_content_filtered”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_parent”]=>
int(0)
[“guid”]=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=42392”
[“menu_order”]=>
int(0)
[“post_type”]=>
string(4) “publish”
[“post_mime_type”]=>
string(0) “”
[“comment_count”]=>
string(1) “0”
[“filter”]=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}

object(WP_Post)#10995 (24) {
[“ID”]=>
int(42295)
[“post_author”]=>
string(2) “36”
[“post_date”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-22 22:52:24”
[“post_date_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-22 22:52:24”
[“post_content”]=>
string(5722) “

What started as a localised environmental disaster in South Australia quickly developed right into a nationwide dialog, shifting from ecological influence to the high-stakes realms of financial survival and political accountability. Our evaluation reveals a story pushed by the devastating photos of marine life loss, and by the highly effective currents of presidency motion, scientific debate, and the tangible financial ache felt by communities. The protection reveals a pivot from the rapid environmental disaster to a sustained deal with two core drivers: the formal political response and the extreme financial penalties for the state’s key industries.

How protection of a pure catastrophe unfolds in fashionable Australia

Authorities and political course of are the first anchors of this protection, shaping the narratives that dominated media dialogue. Two event-driven pillars generated the best peaks in media consideration: the Federal Authorities’s response in July, marked by ministerial visits and the announcement of a multi-million greenback assist bundle, and the extremely publicised Senate inquiry hearings in September. These formal processes persistently generated information, positioning political figures like Federal Minister Murray Watt and SA Minister Clare Scriven because the central topics of the story. Protection from retailers throughout the nation, not simply inside South Australia, demonstrates how the disaster was framed as a matter of nationwide significance, with themes of federal assist and the Senate inquiry resonating far past the affected coastlines.

Native considerations versus huge image narratives: Neighborhood or political accountability?

The place the preliminary reporting centred on the rapid environmental catastrophe, the seen unfold of the bloom and the devastating lack of marine life the dialog shortly broadened. The narrative shifted to system-level impacts, with an intense deal with the financial devastation confronted by the state’s important seafood, oyster, and tourism industries. That is the place a spot emerges between the native and nationwide dialog. South Australian media, led by retailers like ABC Radio Adelaide and FIVEAA, remained intensely targeted on native hardship, giving voice to struggling enterprise house owners and communities. In distinction, nationwide retailers framed the disaster via a lens of coverage and political accountability, dedicating extra relative protection to the Senate inquiry and the bloom’s connection to broader points like local weather change.

Specialists inform the narrative, politicians react

Whereas politicians have been essentially the most steadily talked about topics of the protection, scientific consultants and trade representatives have been essentially the most instantly quoted sources. Professor Mike Steer from SARDI, for instance, was persistently quoted to offer scientific context, whereas trade leaders like Tom Cosentino of Southern Rock Lobster Restricted and Ben Barnes of the SA Skilled Fishers Affiliation gave voice to the financial fallout. This dynamic usually positioned authorities figures just like the Premier, and the Federal Surroundings minister in a reactive place, responding to a disaster being outlined and defined by the consultants and stakeholders on the bottom.

The algal bloom could have peaked within the water, however within the media its story is transferring, in direction of accountability, restoration, science, and the politics of prevention.

Uncover the best way to monitor and perceive advanced media narratives.

”
[“post_title”]=>
string(63) “Algal bloom: The native disaster propelled into nationwide highlight”
[“post_excerpt”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_status”]=>
string(7) “publish”
[“comment_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“ping_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“post_password”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_name”]=>
string(26) “algal-bloom-media-analysis”
[“to_ping”]=>
string(0) “”
[“pinged”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_modified”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-23 00:57:10”
[“post_modified_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-23 00:57:10”
[“post_content_filtered”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_parent”]=>
int(0)
[“guid”]=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=42295”
[“menu_order”]=>
int(0)
[“post_type”]=>
string(4) “publish”
[“post_mime_type”]=>
string(0) “”
[“comment_count”]=>
string(1) “0”
[“filter”]=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}

object(WP_Post)#8390 (24) {
[“ID”]=>
int(42205)
[“post_author”]=>
string(2) “36”
[“post_date”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-17 00:19:00”
[“post_date_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-17 00:19:00”
[“post_content”]=>
string(7830) “

In our final replace, housing protection centred on recommendation for mortgage holders amid rising charges and cost-of-living pressures. On this second launch of the sequence, the dialog has shifted, with information more and more framing Australia’s housing problem via building, innovation, and authorities motion. Stories spotlight fast-tracked developments, AI-powered modular builds, and reforms to chop pink tape, alongside community-driven tasks in Nhulunbuy and pressures on city infrastructure, exhibiting that fixing the disaster requires constructing each quicker and smarter. The patterns in protection reveal which tales and coverage levers are gaining traction, and the way totally different angles from scale and effectivity to localised neighborhood influence are shaping the broader dialog.

Authorities coverage is driving a lot of this protection, shaping the narratives that dominate media dialogue. First-home purchaser packages such because the House Assure (5% Deposit Scheme), Assist to Purchase, and Regional First House Purchaser Assure are steadily cited, alongside social and inexpensive housing initiatives together with the $10 billion Housing Australia Future Fund, NSW’s $610 million Social Housing Accelerator Fund, and state-level tasks in Toowoomba and Wagga Wagga. Protection of supply-side reforms, Melbourne high-rise plans, and debates over adverse gearing, capital beneficial properties, and rental caps illustrates how coverage and regulation body public debate. Throughout retailers and areas, the way in which these tales are advised indicators which parts of housing coverage are resonating, which have momentum, and the place consideration is prone to shift subsequent.

The place earlier reporting centred on rates of interest and mortgage recommendation, a peaceful, and monetary “top-down” dialogue, the shift to building and reform locations the emphasis on system-level options. But, as earlier than, a spot stays between media protection and social discourse.

On social media, the dialog continues to unfold as a “bottom-up” outcry. This month, debates over housing affordability and accessibility have been more and more framed via immigration. Political teams similar to Pauline Hanson’s One Nation and the Household First Celebration Australia are amplifying anti-immigration narratives on X and Fb, claiming that new arrivals are the direct reason for housing stress. These messages are countered by voices rejecting each the logic and the racism seen to underpin such rhetoric, as a substitute pointing to traders as the true drivers of market pressures and reframing housing as a human proper. Demonstrations similar to March for Australia have additional fuelled this dynamic, with slogans tying immigration to Labor, elevating the chance of political harm.

The dialog reveals right-leaning voices proceed to dominate on-line, with extra balanced views struggling for visibility. Coverage proposals like a “bed room tax” seem to have amplified anxieties about inhabitants progress, giving additional oxygen to anti-immigration claims.

Layered over this, the Reserve Financial institution’s three price cuts in current months have change into a recent level of competition. Some argue that decrease charges are merely inflating home costs, benefiting current owners whereas worsening circumstances for would-be consumers and savers deepening the notion of a system stacked in opposition to the general public.

Whereas the media is foregrounding structural options to extend provide, public discourse continues to be pushed by frustration, identification politics, and competing narratives of blame. Fixing the housing disaster is not going to solely require sensible reforms but additionally cautious navigation of the risky public dialog that dangers overshadowing these options.

Uncover the best way to monitor media narratives 

”
[“post_title”]=>
string(78) “Housing narratives within the media and on-line: Constructing options, blaming folks”
[“post_excerpt”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_status”]=>
string(7) “publish”
[“comment_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“ping_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“post_password”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_name”]=>
string(41) “housing-media-analysis-australia-part-two”
[“to_ping”]=>
string(0) “”
[“pinged”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_modified”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-17 00:20:19”
[“post_modified_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-17 00:20:19”
[“post_content_filtered”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_parent”]=>
int(0)
[“guid”]=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=42205”
[“menu_order”]=>
int(0)
[“post_type”]=>
string(4) “publish”
[“post_mime_type”]=>
string(0) “”
[“comment_count”]=>
string(1) “0”
[“filter”]=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}

object(WP_Post)#10993 (24) {
[“ID”]=>
int(41534)
[“post_author”]=>
string(2) “36”
[“post_date”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-01 08:11:00”
[“post_date_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-01 08:11:00”
[“post_content”]=>
string(10302) “

How is media protection shaping views of Brisbane 2032 and its international influence?

The tales that resonate, whether or not it’s a stadium value blowout, a neighborhood marketing campaign to protect inexperienced house, or the push to incorporate Australian Guidelines Soccer in this system, seize how Australians are gearing up for a once-in-a-generation Video games. These particular, contested, and human tales form the narratives throughout information and social media and finally mirror how the nation is experiencing and remembering Brisbane 2032.

Main Subjects: Information vs. social

The distinction is whereas the information media is overwhelmingly involved with the logistics of the Video games, the general public is extra thinking about its social and financial penalties.

On social media, the dialog is a mixture of pleasure and concern, with a powerful deal with what the Video games will really feel like. Discussions about social influence and financial outcomes are distinguished, as folks debate every part from housing affordability to the potential for brand new neighborhood arts packages.

Within the information, the narrative is much extra slender. An unbelievable quantity of the protection is devoted to infrastructure, with a selected deal with the price and controversy surrounding the primary stadium. The second-largest subject is the political jousting that accompanies these infrastructure debates.

Essentially the most mentioned stakeholders are establishments and communities, not people

Whereas politicians dominate the information, what’s making an actual influence on social media are the communities and establishments on the coronary heart of the dialog.

Within the information, the most-quoted voices round Brisbane 2032 are overwhelmingly political figures, led by the Queensland Premier and Deputy Premier. A lot of the protection has centred on Premier Crisafulli’s media appearances, together with a notable cease at Rockhampton’s Fitzroy River to advertise plans for a feasibility research into utilizing the positioning for rowing occasions regardless of considerations about crocodiles and currents.

The Deputy Premier, in the meantime, has been most distinguished for his push to construct a brand new stadium at Victoria Park. That proposal has fuelled debate over whether or not Brisbane 2032 is shifting away from being a sporting mission to a political land seize. The dialogue is additional sharpened by Queensland’s reported scarcity of tradies, with requires pressing measures to recruit extra expert staff to satisfy the surge in building and infrastructure demand tied to the Video games.

Even Donald Trump makes an look within the protection, with Brisbane’s bid to host the Quad Leaders’ Summit drawing headlines and gaining the assist of Prime Minister Albanese.

On social media, the dialog is being formed largely by organisations and grassroots communities. Victoria Park, now on the centre of the stadium debate, has change into a focus for a way folks see the legacy of Brisbane 2032, and Queensland extra broadly. Campaigns to protect the inexperienced house are gaining traction, amplified each by smaller native retailers similar to The Westender and by nationwide publications together with ABC and The Guardian.

Defining “legacy”: The general public hopes and media narratives

The time period “legacy” represents essentially the most vital problem within the Brisbane 2032 narrative, as the information reveals a mismatch between the general public’s deal with expertise and the media’s framing of value and battle.

On social media, the legacy dialog is aspirational and pushed by the sporting theme, the place discussions about preserving inexperienced areas like Victoria Park spotlight a need for tangible, long-term neighborhood advantages. Different cities are additionally seizing the aspirational momentum of occasions like Brisbane 2032, with figures similar to Gold Coast Mayor Tom Tate utilizing social media to focus on for hyper-local audiences the potential returns on investing on this alternative. Information protection frames legacy as a political and financial enterprise, dominated by the price of stadiums, the allocation of funding, and the political battle between the federal government and its opposition.

Framing using the Fitzroy River as a possibility for sustainability or presenting building timelines as native job creation makes the connection between political debates and the neighborhood and sporting outcomes folks really care about extra resonant, whereas additionally portray a optimistic imaginative and prescient for the legacy of Brisbane 2032.

Specificity wins: Obscure PR is ignored, detailed tales drive engagement

Generic ‘excellent news’ posts or Olympic press are likely to generate weaker engagement The content material that captures public consideration is very particular, and infrequently human-centric or controversial.

On social media, essentially the most partaking content material included the controversy round HYROX judging requirements, the passionate marketing campaign to incorporate Garden Bowls within the sports, and celebrating the particular achievements of particular person swimmers.

Within the information, it’s not the final updates that resonate, however detailed studies, whether or not on value blowouts at particular venues, the influence of turning a neighborhood river into an Olympic occasion web site, or the marketing campaign to incorporate Australian Guidelines Soccer in this system.

Media moments and narratives achieve traction when which means is utilized. Shift content material methods from generalities to detailed storytelling, deal with journeys, the tangible influence of a brand new neighborhood facility, or a clear clarification of a posh challenge for instance. The battle for the hearts and minds of the general public forward of Brisbane 2032 will probably be gained in these particulars.

See how the precise evaluation will help you anticipate dangers, form messaging and join along with your audiences. Request a free demo.

”
[“post_title”]=>
string(53) “Profitable the Brisbane 2032 narrative: A media evaluation”
[“post_excerpt”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_status”]=>
string(7) “publish”
[“comment_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“ping_status”]=>
string(4) “open”
[“post_password”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_name”]=>
string(28) “brisbane-2032-media-analysis”
[“to_ping”]=>
string(0) “”
[“pinged”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_modified”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-10 22:54:32”
[“post_modified_gmt”]=>
string(19) “2025-09-10 22:54:32”
[“post_content_filtered”]=>
string(0) “”
[“post_parent”]=>
int(0)
[“guid”]=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=41534”
[“menu_order”]=>
int(0)
[“post_type”]=>
string(4) “publish”
[“post_mime_type”]=>
string(0) “”
[“comment_count”]=>
string(1) “0”
[“filter”]=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}