Danielle Gibbs Koenitzer examines how healthcare establishments handle anti-racism by way of coverage and course of whereas avoiding the structural adjustments required to guard marginalized sufferers and professionals.
__________________________________________
Healthcare methods are fluent within the language of fairness. Hospitals, skilled our bodies, unions, and regulators difficulty anti-racism statements, land acknowledgements, and insurance policies that promise security and inclusion. On paper, this implies progress.
For a lot of marginalized sufferers and well being care professionals, nonetheless, lived expertise tells a unique story. This hole between what establishments say and what folks expertise is the place performative anti-racism takes maintain, not by way of open hostility, however by way of symbolic actions that sign advantage with out shifting energy, sources, or safety.
Picture Description: An AI generated picture of healthcare staff in scrubs and lab coats representing completely different races and genders.
Performative anti-racism isn’t inaction, however motion that stops wanting accountability.
These upcoming examples aren’t summary second-hand anecdotes. They’re experiences I’ve instantly encountered, and if that is what’s seen inside such a small circle, it raises an unavoidable query: what number of related instances exist past it, unrecorded and unseen?
- A 65-year-old man with a historical past of coronary heart illness and stroke offered to the emergency division with leg ache and was discharged with out an evaluation. He later died from a cardiac occasion which will have been preventable.
- A mom introduced her 18-year-old son to the hospital throughout a sickle cell disaster. He was secure when she briefly left to get him a change of garments. Shortly after, she acquired a name from the emergency division informing her that he had died.
- A nurse was reported to HR after colleagues falsely claimed she was unfit to apply as a result of they didn’t wish to work with a Black nurse. She in the end left her function as a consequence of ongoing bullying and harassment.
- After I skilled ovarian torsion, a time-sensitive gynecologic emergency, my ache was questioned, and the urgency was minimized as I fought to avoid wasting my ovary by way of ache and misery. My scientific information {and professional} standing provided no safety. I embrace my very own expertise not as an exception, however as a part of the identical sample.
What unites these examples isn’t the absence of coverage, however its presence. Establishments proclaim commitments to fairness and anti-racism, but safety is absent.
Land acknowledgements supply the same instance. They’re typically delivered on stolen land whereas Indigenous communities proceed to expertise dispossession and underfunding. The land stays colonized, and energy doesn’t shift. Black Historical past Month occasions and Pleasure celebrations comply with the identical sample: visibility with out energy, recognition with out change.
Hospitals, unions, {and professional} organizations typically insist that each one complaints are dealt with pretty by way of standardized processes. But treating all considerations as equal ignores energy, historical past, and bias. Racism isn’t merely interpersonal battle; it’s structural and cumulative.
For a lot of marginalized sufferers and well being care professionals, elevating considerations about discrimination results in heightened scrutiny.
- For sufferers, ache or signs are questioned, reframed as anxiousness, non-compliance, or exaggeration.
- For well being care professionals: considerations about bias are redirected into evaluations of competence or professionalism.
In each instances, Hurt is reframed, shifting the query from “the place did the system fail?” to “how did you fail the system?”
Establishments continuously defend these processes by pointing to intent: investigators are skilled, insurance policies exist, and committees are lively. However ethics isn’t measured completely by intent however influence is essential as effectively. When sufferers depart care feeling dismissed, or professionals depart processes feeling remoted, blamed, or silenced, one thing has failed.
The moral failure of performative anti-racism is that it permits effort to face in for effectiveness.
Silence isn’t success. It’s information. When sufferers cease advocating as a result of they’ve been dismissed, establishments mistake that silence for satisfaction. When well being care professionals cease reporting discrimination out of worry of retaliation or profession hurt, organizations assume methods are working.
A course of can’t be honest if individuals are afraid to talk inside it, and a coverage can’t be protecting if these it claims to assist don’t consider it should.
Real anti-racism isn’t a press release, an occasion, or a committee. It requires recognizing that neutrality isn’t equity, that equal therapy doesn’t produce equitable outcomes, and that some harms demand completely different responses. Methods constructed with out marginalized voices will proceed to fail them.
Moral anti-racism asks uncomfortable questions:
- Who advantages from present processes?
- Who’s protected, and who’s assessed?
- Who feels protected in search of assist, and who doesn’t?
- What occurs when coverage meets actuality?
Till establishments transfer past efficiency and confront these questions actually, anti-racism will stay symbolic. Moral apply isn’t confirmed by intent or declarations alone, however by accountability to these most susceptible.
__________________________________________
Danielle Gibbs Koenitzer is a Medical Nurse Educator at London Well being Sciences Centre and a Half-Time Professor at Fanshawe School, dedicated to advancing fairness in healthcare.
The views offered are the creator’s private views and don’t mirror the positions of any affiliated establishments.
