Tungsten Automation (previously Kofax) is a frontrunner in enterprise software program, providing options starting from course of automation to analytics. Their doc processing instruments have been significantly common, serving to organizations seize and course of enterprise paperwork for many years.
It does the fundamentals very effectively: changing paperwork from numerous sources, dealing with excessive volumes, and sending data to your small business techniques like SAP. That is why many firms, most likely together with you, have relied on it for years.
However this is the factor: doc processing has come a great distance. You’ll be able to’t depend on merchandise that drive you to:
💡
1. Rent exterior consultants for ongoing help
2. Months to study the platform and rise up to hurry
3. Pay for costly setup, upkeep, and help
4. Have lengthy wait occasions and get restricted assist
This text examines a number of the greatest Tungsten (Kofax) alternate options particularly for doc processing, serving to you consider choices that match in the present day’s enterprise wants.
A fast take a look at Tungsten Automation alternate options
This is how the highest rivals evaluate:
| Software | Fundamental Function | G2 Score | Free Trial | Pricing | Complete Rating* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tungsten (previously Kofax) | Template-based processing | 4.3/5 | No | Customized | 43.0 |
| Nanonets | AI-powered automation | 4.8/5 | Sure | From $999 | 46.5 |
| ABBYY FlexiCapture | Superior OCR | 4.1/5 | No | Customized | 44.3 |
| Rossum | Cognitive information seize | 4.4/5 | Sure | Customized | 43.8 |
| Docparser | Rule-based extraction | 4.6/5 | Sure | From $39 | 44.0 |
| Hyperscience | Human-in-loop workflows | 4.6/5 | No | Customized | 46.3 |
| Klippa DocHorizon | No-code automation | 4.7/5 | Sure | Customized | NA |
| DocuWare | Full doc administration | 4.4/5 | Sure | From $50/person | 43.9 |
| Laserfiche | Enterprise content material administration | 4.7/5 | Sure | From $50/person | 43.9 |
| OpenText | SAP integration targeted | 4.2/5 | No | Customized | 43.2 |
*Complete Rating calculated because the sum of G2 scores for: Ease of Use, Ease of Setup, High quality of Help, Meets Necessities, and Product Path (% constructive). All scores are based mostly on verified G2 scores as of November 2024.
Let us take a look at every different intimately that will help you discover the very best match in your wants.
1. Nanonets
Sure, we put ourselves on this checklist. However hear us out — Nanonets is an AI doc processing platform that helps firms extract and course of information from any doc kind mechanically. Whereas Tungsten depends on templates and technical setups, Nanonets makes use of AI to know and course of paperwork immediately.
💡
Key options:
1. AI that learns out of your paperwork
2. No templates wanted – works with any format
3. Automated desk detection and extraction
4. Constructed-in accuracy checks
5. Direct connection to accounting techniques
6. Straightforward approval workflows
7. Works with 40+ languages
8. Actual-time processing
9. Easy API entry
| Execs of Nanonets | Cons of Nanonets |
|---|---|
| Begin processing with out IT assist | Unaffordable for very low volumes |
| Learns and improves by itself | Organising advanced workflows might take time |
| Works with any doc format | |
| Direct SAP and accounting connections | |
| Hook up with different software program with out coding | |
| Quick, useful help crew |
Pricing: Begin free with 500 pages per 30 days. Enterprise plans from $999/month for 10,000 pages.
Finest suited to: Mid-sized to giant firms processing excessive quantity of paperwork month-to-month, particularly in finance, healthcare, and logistics. Works significantly effectively for groups that have to automate AP workflows, course of diversified vendor paperwork, or deal with paperwork in a number of languages.
How does Nanonets evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | Nanonets | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 9.3/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 9.2/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 9.4/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product route | 9.4/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Choose Nanonets if you wish to course of paperwork with out the headache of making and sustaining templates. Our platform works significantly effectively if you could course of several types of paperwork, join instantly along with your accounting system, get correct outcomes with out fixed changes, and arrange rapidly with out technical assist.
2. ABBYY FlexiCapture
ABBYY FlexiCapture is a doc processing platform targeted on accuracy and compliance. It helps mid-sized and enormous firms course of advanced paperwork with excessive precision, providing each cloud and on-premises choices. Whereas the arrange could be arduous like Tungsten Automation, it presents increased for accuracy.
Learn Extra: ABBYY FlexiCapture Alternate options and Rivals
💡
Key options:
1. Superior OCR with excessive precision information seize
2. Versatile deployment – cloud or on-premises
3. Constructed-in compliance and validation guidelines
4. Excessive-volume batch processing capabilities
5. Multi-channel doc enter (electronic mail, scan, fax)
6. Enterprise system integration instruments
| Execs of FlexiCapture | Cons of FlexiCapture |
|---|---|
| Extremely correct information extraction | Takes longer to arrange than Tungsten |
| Sturdy compliance and audit options | Requires technical experience |
| Selection of cloud or on-premises | Increased upfront funding |
| Higher product growth roadmap | Not appropriate for small companies |
| Glorious for advanced paperwork | Steeper studying curve |
Pricing: Customized pricing based mostly on deployment kind and doc quantity. Count on increased upfront prices for on-premises deployment.
Finest suited to: Mid-sized firms (particularly in software program, accounting, and consulting) that want exact doc processing with sturdy compliance controls. Significantly useful for organizations dealing with advanced paperwork or requiring particular deployment choices.
How does ABBYY evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | ABBYY | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8.7/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 8.0/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Assembly wants | 8.0/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Future route | 10.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Select ABBYY FlexiCapture if accuracy and compliance are your high priorities, and you’ve got the technical assets for implementation. Go together with Tungsten for those who want one thing less complicated to make use of or do not require superior compliance options.
3. Rossum
Rossum is an clever doc processing platform that makes use of AI to extract information from enterprise paperwork. The platform processes paperwork from a number of channels (electronic mail, scan, API), mechanically validates the extracted information, and integrates with enterprise techniques. It’s used primarily for bill processing and monetary doc automation.
💡
Key options:
1. AI-powered doc understanding
2. Constructed-in validation guidelines engine
3. Multi-channel doc receiving
4. Two-way communication for points
5. Enterprise system integrations
6. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 licensed
| Execs of Rossum | Cons of Rossum |
|---|---|
| No templates wanted for brand new paperwork | System updates could cause disruptions |
| Sturdy enterprise-grade help | Slower with giant PDF recordsdata |
| Constructed-in exception dealing with | Increased value than fundamental options |
| Good at advanced paperwork | Preliminary studying curve for groups |
| Common AI enhancements | Restricted Excel file help |
Pricing: Enterprise-focused pricing with customized quotes based mostly on quantity. Contains SLA ensures and devoted help.
Finest suited to: Mid-sized to giant organizations in accounting, monetary companies, and manufacturing that course of diversified vendor paperwork. Works particularly effectively for AP departments and shared service facilities dealing with numerous doc sorts.
How does Rossum evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | Rossum | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8.6/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 8.1/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 9.2/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 8.3/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product route | 9.8/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Select Rossum for those who course of plenty of totally different doc sorts and wish to keep away from template upkeep. Choose Tungsten for those who primarily deal with standardized paperwork and like a extra standard interface.
4. Docparser
Docparser is a doc extraction instrument that makes use of zonal OCR expertise to tug information from particular areas in your paperwork. In contrast to Tungsten’s enterprise strategy, Docparser presents an easier, extra reasonably priced resolution targeted on particular information extraction wants. The platform focuses on processing structured paperwork like invoices, buy orders, and financial institution statements,
💡
Key options:
1. Zonal OCR for exact information seize
2. Customized parsing rule creation
3. A number of doc format help
4. Direct integration with enterprise instruments
5. Automated doc routing
6. Desk information extraction
7. Multi-channel doc consumption (electronic mail, API, add)
| Execs of Docparser | Cons of Docparser |
|---|---|
| Reasonably priced beginning value | Studying curve for advanced guidelines |
| Fast setup for fundamental wants | Restricted help for various layouts |
| Sturdy desk extraction | Wants good doc high quality |
| Straightforward integration choices | Not ideally suited for unstructured docs |
| Clear pricing construction | Restricted language help |
Pricing: Begins at $39/month for 100 paperwork. Marketing strategy at $159/month for 1,000 paperwork.
Finest suited to: Small companies processing constant doc codecs, particularly in retail and accounting. Preferrred for firms dealing with 1,000-3,500 paperwork month-to-month that have to automate guide information entry from structured paperwork like buy orders and invoices.
How does Docparser evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | Docparser | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 9.2/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 8.5/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 9.1/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product route | 8.6/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Should you want reasonably priced, easy information extraction for constant doc codecs, then Docparser is an effective alternative. Tungsten might swimsuit you higher for those who want enterprise-grade options or course of diversified doc sorts.
5. Hyperscience
Hyperscience is an AI-powered doc processing platform that makes a speciality of dealing with each structured and unstructured paperwork. The platform stands out for its potential to course of handwritten textual content and complicated paperwork with a high-level of accuracy. Companies and banks, use it to course of paperwork like varieties, contracts, and claims.
Learn About: Hyperscience Alternate options and Rivals
💡
Key options:
1. Superior handwriting recognition
2. Human-in-loop verification
3. Structured and unstructured doc help
4. Multi-language processing
5. Customized processing blocks
6. Automated high quality management
7. Enterprise system integration
| Execs of Hyperscience | Cons of Hyperscience |
|---|---|
| Will get handwritten textual content proper most occasions | Takes time to arrange correctly |
| Catches errors mechanically | Wants plenty of examples for coaching |
| Works with many doc sorts | Complicated paperwork want extra checking |
| Retains bettering as you utilize it | Prices greater than fundamental options |
| Good technical help | Not for small doc volumes |
Pricing: Customized enterprise pricing based mostly on quantity and use case. Contact Hyperscience for particulars.
Finest suited to: Mid to giant enterprises in monetary companies, insurance coverage, and healthcare that have to course of diversified doc sorts, particularly these with handwritten elements.
How does Hyperscience evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | Hyperscience | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 9.3/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 9.0/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 9.1/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product route | 9.8/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: In case your groups course of hundreds of handwritten varieties or advanced paperwork month-to-month, and accuracy issues greater than preliminary value, you may discover worth in Hyperscience. Stick with Tungsten for those who primarily deal with normal paperwork or want an easier, extra reasonably priced resolution.
6. Klippa DocHorizon
Klippa DocHorizon is a no-code doc processing platform that mixes AI with conventional OCR. The platform stands out for its fast setup and API-first strategy, making it significantly interesting if you wish to begin processing paperwork with out intensive technical work.
Learn About: Finest Klippa Alternate options and Rivals
💡
Key options:
1. No-code doc processing
2. Good fraud detection that spots altered paperwork
3. Visible workflow designer for automation
4. Multi-channel doc consumption
5. Checks information accuracy in real-time
6. Two-way system integration
7. Human verification choice
| Execs of Klippa | Cons of Klippa |
|---|---|
| Get began in hours, not weeks | Might not meet each customized want |
| Builders love the clear API | Takes time to study your paperwork |
| Help crew jumps on issues | Complicated paperwork want extra work |
| Nails the fundamentals immediately | Not low-cost for small volumes |
| Platform retains getting higher |
Pricing: Customized pricing based mostly on quantity and options wanted. Contact Klippa for particulars.
Finest suited to: Small to mid-sized firms in finance, accounting, and retail that want fast implementation of doc processing. Works effectively for organizations desirous to automate normal doc workflows with out heavy technical funding.
How does Klippa evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
Not sufficient information to do a direcct comparability. Based mostly on out there person opinions, Klippa stands out for quicker setup and less complicated integration. Nevertheless, it is customization choices could also be restricted in comparison with Tungsten.
➡️
Our take: Choose Klippa when you could hit the bottom working with doc automation. Their no-code strategy means you may see ends in days, not months. However look elsewhere for those who want deep customization or deal with plenty of uncommon doc sorts — that is the place Tungsten nonetheless shines.
7. DocuWare
DocuWare is an enterprise doc administration platform that mixes doc processing with workflow automation. It helps organizations digitize, automate, and handle document-intensive processes. The platform presents each cloud and on-premises deployment choices.
💡
Key options:
1. Good doc seize and indexing
2. Customized digital varieties builder
3. Visible workflow designer
4. Multi-language help (24 languages)
5. Constructed-in compliance instruments
6. Cell doc entry
7. Enterprise system connections
| Execs of DocuWare | Cons of DocuWare |
|---|---|
| Discover paperwork rapidly throughout areas | Wants consultants for setup |
| Automates complete doc workflows | Complicated permission administration |
| Sturdy safety for regulated industries | Takes time to study superior options |
| Works in lots of languages | Restricted offline entry |
| Retains bettering with common updates | Some fundamental options value further |
Pricing: Contact DocuWare for customized pricing. Free trial out there to check the system.
Finest suited to: Mid-sized to giant organizations dealing with plenty of paperwork throughout a number of areas. Works significantly effectively for firms in regulated industries like prescription drugs and insurance coverage that want sturdy compliance options.
How does DocuWare evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | DocuWare | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8.8/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 7.7/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 8.9/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 9.0/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product route | 9.4/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Choose DocuWare whenever you want extra than simply doc seize — it shines at automating complete doc workflows throughout departments. However if you would like one thing less complicated targeted simply on processing paperwork, Tungsten is likely to be a greater match.
8. Laserfiche
Laserfiche is an enterprise content material administration platform that features doc processing capabilities. It combines doc seize with data administration and workflow automation. The platform helps a number of languages and presents each cloud and on-premises deployment choices.
💡
Key options:
1. Doc seize and classification
2. Constructed-in workflow automation
3. Digital varieties creation
4. Data administration system
5. Safety and audit controls
6. Cell doc entry
7. Big selection of integrations out there
8. Division-specific workflows
| Execs of Laserfiche | Cons of Laserfiche |
|---|---|
| Fast doc search throughout areas | Complicated to arrange correctly |
| Sturdy safety for regulated industries | Wants technical experience |
| Good at automating workflows | Steep studying curve |
| Works in a number of languages | Restricted offline entry |
| Common platform updates | Some options value further |
Pricing: Begins at $50/person/yr for cloud starter package deal. Contact Laserfiche for enterprise pricing.
Finest suited to: Mid-sized organizations, particularly in authorities and schooling that want each doc processing and data administration. Works significantly effectively for organizations with strict compliance necessities.
How does Laserfiche evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | Laserfiche | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8.8/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 8.1/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 8.9/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 9.1/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product route | 9.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Think about Laserfiche whenever you want extra than simply doc processing. Should you worth the power to deal with advanced doc workflows whereas assembly compliance necessities, then it is likely to be a sensible choice. However for those who simply want easy doc seize, Tungsten presents an easier path.
9. OpenText Clever Seize
OpenText Clever Seize (previously Captiva) combines machine studying with conventional OCR to automate doc processing. The platform shines at processing structured paperwork like invoices, significantly when related to SAP and different backend techniques.
💡
Key options:
1. Good doc classification
2. Superior information extraction
3. Automated content material routing
4. Machine studying capabilities
5. Constructed-in validation instruments
6. Hyperlinks instantly with SAP techniques
7. Course of automation choices
| Execs of OpenText | Cons of OpenText |
|---|---|
| Good at structured paperwork | Home windows-only consumer |
| Reduces guide information entry | Complicated to deploy |
| Sturdy validation instruments | Restricted documentation |
| Useful help crew | Efficiency points with quantity |
| Common updates | Wants technical experience |
Pricing: Contact OpenText for customized pricing based mostly in your wants.
Finest suited to: Small firms processing plenty of structured paperwork like invoices and varieties, particularly these utilizing SAP.
How does OpenText evaluate to Tungsten Automation?
| Parameter | OpenText | Tungsten |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 8.2/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Setup expertise | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Help high quality | 7.8/10 | 7.7/10 |
| Meets wants | 8.5/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Product route | 7.6/10 | 7.5/10 |
➡️
Our take: Think about OpenText whenever you want sturdy information extraction for structured paperwork and have technical assets for implementation. Nevertheless, Tungsten is likely to be higher if you would like one thing simpler to make use of or have to course of diversified doc sorts.
How to decide on the very best Tungsten Automation different?
At Nanonets, we course of hundreds of thousands of paperwork month-to-month for over 500 enterprises, together with 35% of Fortune 500 firms. We have helped lots of of organizations transition from legacy doc seize techniques to trendy automation options. This evaluation attracts from our expertise implementing doc processing options throughout industries and processing hundreds of thousands of paperwork month-to-month.
We have analyzed the highest alternate options based mostly on:
- Actual efficiency information from processing hundreds of thousands of paperwork
- Suggestions from firms that switched from Tungsten
- Unbiased opinions from G2, Capterra, and Gartner
- Arms-on testing by doc processing consultants
Scoring methodology*
We evaluated every different throughout 5 key parameters that matter most to organizations switching from Tungsten:
- Ease of use: How rapidly groups can begin utilizing the instrument with out intensive technical coaching
- Ease of setup: Implementation effort in comparison with Tungsten’s template-based strategy
- High quality of help: Availability and responsiveness of direct help
- Meets necessities: Skill to deal with doc processing wants successfully
- Product route: Tempo of enhancements and have growth
Detailed scoring breakdown
| Software | Ease of Use | Setup | Help | Meets Wants | Path | Complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tungsten (previously Kofax) | 9.0 | 8.3 | 7.7 | 8.9 | 7.5 | 43.0 |
| Nanonets | 9.3 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 46.5 |
| ABBYY FlexiCapture | 8.8 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 44.3 |
| Rossum | 8.6 | 8.1 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 9.8 | 43.8 |
| Docparser | 9.2 | 8.5 | 9.1 | 8.7 | 8.6 | 44.0 |
| Hyperscience | 9.3 | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 46.3 |
| Klippa DocHorizon | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| DocuWare | 8.8 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.9 |
| Laserfiche | 8.8 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 43.9 |
| OpenText | 8.2 | 8.3 | 7.8 | 8.5 | 7.6 | 43.2 |
Key choice elements
Based mostly on widespread challenges organizations face with Tungsten Automation, contemplate these points:
Doc processing wants
First, consider your doc necessities:
- Are you primarily processing normal invoices and varieties?
- Do you could deal with handwritten textual content?
- How vital is desk extraction accuracy?
- Do you course of paperwork in a number of languages?
Technical assets
Think about your implementation capabilities:
- Do you’ve IT groups for setup and upkeep?
- What techniques want integration with doc processing?
- Do you favor cloud or on-premises deployment?
- How vital is API accessibility?
Quantity and scale
Take into consideration your processing necessities:
- What number of paperwork do you course of month-to-month?
- Do you want batch processing capabilities?
- Are your volumes regular or seasonal?
- How rapidly do you could scale?
Help and upkeep
Consider your help wants:
- How a lot vendor help will you want?
- Are you able to deal with template upkeep?
- What degree of automation do you require?
- How vital is native help?t
*Disclaimer: This evaluation makes use of information from impartial person opinions, technical documentation, and implementation case research out there as of November 2024. Since doc processing applied sciences evolve quickly:
- Function units and capabilities might have modified
- Pricing fashions would possibly differ from what’s listed
- Efficiency metrics may range based mostly in your particular use case
- Integration choices might have expanded
- New options might have been added
We suggest reaching out to distributors instantly for essentially the most present data and testing any resolution totally along with your precise paperwork earlier than making a call.
