We people have mastered fireplace, cut up the atom, and shot ourselves into area. We have constructed machines that may outthink us and instruments that may prepare dinner us lunch or minimize open our chests to carry out life-saving surgical procedures. That is all properly and good. The area half is actually cool, positive … nevertheless it would not appear to be us. It would not really feel human.
So what’s the logical subsequent step? Instructing humanoid robots to bounce like us, clearly.
Dance is not simply our factor both. Birds of Paradise, for instance, have mating rituals so intricate and elaborate that folks type golf equipment simply to catch a glimpse of the present. The males ruffle their tail feathers and two-step into the hearts of females in an effort to get some motion. Very very similar to people.
Uncommon Footage of New Hen of Paradise Species Exhibits Odd Courtship Dance | Nat Geo Wild
And the Manakin is arguably higher at moonwalking than the man who made it well-known, Michael Jackson, whereas Australia’s Peacock Spiders strikes are as flashy as their outfits.
Even bugs are in on dance, although theirs is extra math equation than occasion trick. The honey bee’s “waggle dance” reveals which route to seek out meals relative to the solar – like a fuzzy little booty-shaking Pythagoras.
Bee Dance (Waggle Dance)
However why robots?
“The strongest argument for robots in a human type is that our world is already designed for people, making it straightforward for humanoid robots to slot in, adapt to current environments, and be seamlessly repurposed,” says Humanoid, maker of the HMND 1.
Arduous to disagree. The humanoid type additionally makes it simpler for us to anthropomorphize our new mechanical buddies – for higher or for worse. I’ve personally been moved by just a few movies, like one from 1X of its Neo Gamma robotic the place it simply seems to be completely pitiful because it does chores, largely ignored by the people it serves.
However seeing a humanoid robotic dance? That is way more joyful and far more enjoyable … even when a bit freaky. Few issues embody the human spirit higher than dancing.
Dancing animatronics have been round for a very long time to entertain us and make us smile. Disney’s It is a Small World first debuted on the 1964 New York World’s Truthful earlier than changing into a everlasting Disneyland trip in 1966 – a loop of tiny human-like figures dancing day by day by way of hydraulics and pulleys. And Chuck E. Cheese’s animatronic Pizza Time Gamers have been making children cry since 1977.
Sixty years later and issues are wildly completely different. Onboard CPUs and GPUs, reinforcement studying (RL), physics engines, proprioception, laptop imaginative and prescient with real-time object recognition, SLAM navigation, IMUs with gyros and accelerometers, tactile sensors, microcontrollers, servos, and batteries good for hours of runtime – the listing goes on.
One of many earlier mainstream dancing bots segments I keep in mind was in 2005, when Beck’s “Hell Sure” video featured a gaggle of Sony QRIO bots chopping unfastened on the dance ground. For its time, it was nuts. The QRIO (Quest for cuRIOsity) was constructed for leisure, stood 2 ft (60 cm) tall, weighed 16 lb (7.3 kg), and had 38 levels of freedom (DoF). It might stroll, run, bounce, and most significantly, dance. They had been by no means offered publicly, after which instantly scrapped only a 12 months later in 2006.
Beck – Hell Sure (Official Music Video)
In 2008, Aldebaran Robotics got here out swinging with the NAO Robotic. It was constructed for the schooling sector and located niches in remedy, autism interventions, and STEM. It stood 22.8 in (58 cm) tall, weighed 11.9 lb (5.4 kg), and had 25 DoF. It was offered largely to varsities and labs and it price between $7,000 and $15,000 per robotic.
Although it wasn’t totally open supply, it was programmable inside sure constraints. Almost the second it acquired into customers’ palms, the NAO was hacked right into a dancing machine utilizing Choregraphe, a drag-and-drop movement sequencer. In all probability probably the most well-known video of all of them was the NAO remake of Judson Laipply’s “Evolution of Dance.”
Evolution Of Dance by NAO Robotic
By 2017, Toyota confirmed off its T-HR3 robotic – extremely fluid, even pulling off delicate Tai Chi strikes … nevertheless it was teleoperated, mimicking a human in a management swimsuit and VR goggles. It wasn’t absolutely autonomous, however I included it on this listing as a result of it could have been one of many first to succeed in these ranges of human-like fluidity, hinting at what the long run might maintain.
Demonstration of T-HR3 robotic by Toyota at iRex17 (half 2 of two) [RAW VIDEO]
Then Boston Dynamics dropped the hammer in late 2020. Humanity was caught at house, locked down throughout the COVID pandemic, when instantly Spot, Atlas, and Deal with had been doing the mashed potato, the twist, and a full dance routine to The Contours’ 1962 hit “Do You Love Me?” About 42 million individuals watched, jaws collectively on the ground.
The primary-generation Atlas – a 4-ft 11-in (1.5-m), 176-lb (80-kg), largely hydraulically powered humanoid robotic – moved so properly that years later, skeptics nonetheless insist it is CGI. It is not. In reality, filming that routine uncovered flaws that required Boston Dynamics to make upgrades to Atlas simply to drag off the routine. And keep in mind, Atlas was additionally the primary humanoid to land a standing backflip again in 2017.
Do You Love Me?
Since then, issues have solely escalated.
Chinese language firm Unitree burst onto the scene with the G1 – a 4-ft 4-in (1.3-m), 77-lb (35-kg) bot with as much as 43 DoF, 3D LiDAR, functioning palms … and insane athleticism (roboticism?). It was the primary humanoid ‘bot to do a entrance flip, the primary to backflip with out hydraulics, and it might kip-up from its again like a seasoned martial artist. And sure, it dances – higher than I do, actually.
What Dance Would You Wish to Carry out with Unitree G1?
However the inspiration for this complete piece was Tesla’s Optimus.
Milan Kovac, former Tesla VP of Optimus Engineering, posted a clip of Optimus’ RL-trained dance strikes – “zero-shot” from digital to actual life. Mainly, it realized the choreography in simulation, then nailed it in actual life on the primary attempt. That is like imagining your self dancing Swan Lake whereas laying on the sofa, then standing up and truly doing it.
This is a bit extra, and no cables this time 😉
It is all real-time velocity, zero CGI, absolutely realized in Simulation & zero-shot transferred to actual.
Apart from the truth that it is enjoyable, we needed to make important enhancements to our robotic mannequin in Sim, area randomization and different… https://t.co/Fhnm84vDQE
— Milan Kovac (@_milankovac_) Might 14, 2025
Albeit brief, seeing Optimus pull off a fundamental ballet step floored me. It was the primary time I’ve seen a humanoid robotic try precise ballet, and it felt like a turning level; a real shift in robotic capabilities. Huawei did a half-ballet collab again in 2021, however this was on one other degree.
I requested the wifey – who’s very a lot anti-AI and anti-robot – what she thought. Her solely phrases: “Why are we making robots like people? I do not prefer it.” A sentiment echoed in 1000’s of feedback in these YouTube movies.
And but … right here we’re.
From QRIO to Optimus, humanoid robots are actually dancing their means into the cultural highlight. And these aren’t simply novelty robots anymore – fashionable humanoids are extremely superior platforms with a whole bunch of tens of millions of {dollars} invested in R&D. Machines that may price properly over $100,000 to make only a single unit. They’ve fluidity, steadiness, and precision that typically makes us look clumsy. The truth that we’re making these machines waltz, working man, and even plié is not nearly leisure anymore – it is about testing the boundaries of movement, of AI, and of human-robot interplay.
So perhaps educating robots to bounce is not actually the “subsequent step” in technological evolution … nevertheless it may be probably the most human one but.

